Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:04

Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.

I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.

To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.

Strange signals detected from Antarctic ice seem to defy laws of physics. Scientists are searching for an answer - Yahoo

So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.

At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).

So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).

Why do people keep saying they have evidence and have presented it that proves you're wrong even though they have none and haven't presented anything? Furthermore, what do they think you're wrong about?

Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).

Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.

But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.

Scientists Caught Sperm Defying One of Newton's Laws of Physics - ScienceAlert